...
ADVERTISEMENT

The Choicer Voicer

The Choicer Voicer

The judges in The Choicer Voicer are not people at all — they are computer-controlled panelists who sit and vote on your vocal impressions round by round, and the whole idea traces back to a streamer’s throwaway suggestion in December 2023. That single comment from Vinny Vinesauce, wondering aloud if someone should remake the old “Choicest Voice” minigame from Mario Party: Island Tour, is the reason this game exists at all.

Genre Party / comedy
Players 1-4
Platforms Windows, Linux
Status Early access alpha

From a Vinesauce Joke to The Choicer Voicer

Developer YeahMaybe was messing around with the Godot engine at the time and decided to take the suggestion literally. The first version was barely more than a meme: a handful of hard-coded audio clips and a basic scoring loop built to imitate the old Mario Party bit where players do their best impression of a character’s voice and a panel decides who nailed it.

What changed things was a decision to let the game load files at runtime instead of keeping everything hard-coded. Once voice packs could be swapped in from a folder instead of baked into the game, the scope kept widening. The developer has put it plainly: “Why customize just the voice packs?” That question ended up reshaping menus, the judge panel, the studio itself, and eventually the host character too.

A small team filled in around that expanding idea. AzureOtsu composes the music, leaning into a distinctly 2000s sound. Kiophen handled the artwork for a character named Shae. Studio Jimbly built out the GLTF import pipeline that lets players bring in their own studio models. None of this was planned from day one — it grew because the core loop of doing a voice and getting judged for it turned out to be worth building around.

Judges, Studios, and How Rounds Play Out

The main mode is a game show studio built for one to four players. Someone picks a prompt, players record their impression through a microphone, and the panel of computer judges votes on each performance. It plays out in short bursts — a full round takes a few minutes, which keeps it usable as a party format rather than something that demands a long sitting.

Recording works through live microphone input with waveform playback, so you can hear your own take before the judges weigh in. It is a simple loop by design: record, get judged, pass the controller. The comedy comes from the gap between what you meant to sound like and what actually came out of the microphone.

There is also a Twitch-facing option where a streamer’s chat votes on performances instead of the built-in judge panel, and a separate Dub Mode where players record a voiceover over a scene rather than performing a character impression cold. Both modes reuse the same recording core, just pointed at a different kind of judging or a different kind of prompt.

What You Can Actually Customize

  • Voice packs — adding a new one is just dropping audio files into a folder
  • The judge panel and host character
  • The game show studio’s look, including imported GLTF models
  • Menu aesthetics
  • Content packs that bundle several of the above for others to download

Building Content Packs for The Choicer Voicer

Because the loading system pulls from folders rather than fixed files, making something new does not require touching code. A voice pack is just audio clips arranged the way the game expects them. That low barrier is presumably why content packs exist as a shareable unit in the first place — it lets a group of friends build a pack full of in-jokes without anyone needing to understand Godot.

This same openness is also where the game’s rough edges show. Microphone recording has known problems, particularly on surround-sound audio setups, and the developer has been upfront that this stems from a Godot engine limitation rather than something easily patched from the game’s side. It is the kind of issue that comes with building on an engine still maturing in this area, and it currently requires some trial and error with audio settings to work around.

The game currently sits at an early access alpha stage, with foundational code that the developer describes as a couple of years old at this point — a sign of how much has been layered on top since that first meme build. A “No Gameplay Demo” exists purely for testing whether your microphone is picked up correctly before you commit to a full session.

Pricing and Where It Stands Now

Access uses a pay-what-you-want model with a five dollar minimum, and it runs on Windows and Linux. Reception on itch.io currently sits at 4.8 out of 5 across 57 ratings, which for a game still in early alpha with acknowledged microphone bugs is a fairly strong signal that the core bit — impressions judged round by round — lands for the people trying it.

On the technical side, the toolchain behind it mixes Godot for the engine with GIMP for art, Audacity for audio cleanup, FL Studio for the score, and Blender for anything that needs modeling. The listing is upfront that no generative AI was used anywhere in its content, and right now everything is presented in English only, with mouse-driven menus throughout.

The Choicer Voicer is still a small, actively changing project, but its origin as a one-off tribute to a Mario Party minigame is easy to see in every round: pick a prompt, do the voice, let the panel decide, and pass it to the next person.

Planet Clicker 2 img

The Choicer Voicer looks like a goofy party game about doing funny voices, but it plays more like a toolkit that only comes alive once you’ve fed it something to work with. There’s no built-in cast of characters waiting to be unlocked and no story mode to clear first — just a judge panel, a host, a studio, and a microphone, all of it empty until you decide what goes in.

An Empty Studio Waiting on Your Voice Packs

Most new players open the game expecting content and instead find a nearly blank library. That’s intentional. The judge panel reacts to whatever’s loaded into an active voice pack, and building one is as simple as dropping audio files into the right folder — no scripting, no modding tools, just clips. Community-made packs, from meme audio to niche character quotes, are what actually fill out most sessions people play.

Voice pack: a folder of short audio clips tied to a character or theme, which the judge panel, host, and studio all pull from once it’s active.

Because content is entirely swappable, two groups running the same install can end up with completely different sessions. One night might be built around obscure internet memes, the next around inside jokes from a specific friend group — the underlying game show format never changes, only what gets performed inside it.

Genre Voice-acting party game
Players 1 to 4 locally
Core tool Microphone and content packs
Extra modes Dub Mode, Twitch chat mode

Judges, Hosts, and the Actual Scoring Loop

The core loop is easy to describe: a clip plays, you attempt to recreate it out loud, and a row of judges scores the attempt. Between one and four players can sit in the same studio session, with computer-controlled judges casting votes rather than other humans bluffing each other, which keeps the format functional even as a solo warm-up.

Once players start caring about the score rather than just the bit, they notice patterns — clarity, timing, and pitch-matching all seem to move the needle, even though the exact judging logic is never explained outright. That opacity is genuinely divisive: some players enjoy chasing an unclear scoring system, others find it frustrating that a good impression sometimes scores lower than expected.

Dub Mode strips scoring away entirely, letting a player record a voiceover over a chosen scene instead of being judged, which makes it a softer entry point before jumping into the competitive studio format.

Built on a Five-Minute Mario Party Bit

The whole format traces back to The Choicest Voice, a minigame from a Mario Party installment where players imitated a randomly assigned character while a panel of enemies judged the attempt. The Choicer Voicer stretches that same idea into a full standalone game, keeping the judged-performance structure but opening up who gets voiced, who judges, and how the whole thing looks.

That lineage matters for how players approach it. Anyone expecting a polished, pre-loaded cast will bounce off quickly, while players who understand they’re buying into a content platform first and a game show second tend to get far more mileage out of a session.

The Microphone Problem Nobody’s Fixed Yet

The single most reported issue is microphones simply failing to record mid-session, an issue tied to surround-sound audio configurations that the underlying engine handles poorly. It’s frustrating because it can make an entire session unplayable with no warning, and there’s no official fix yet — players have found workarounds by routing audio through a virtual output device and monitoring it externally, but that’s a workaround, not a solution.

Streamers running the Twitch chat variant, where viewers vote live on a performance instead of computer judges, report the same audio hiccups occasionally bleeding into their broadcasts. It’s a rough edge that the community openly debates: some treat it as a dealbreaker, others shrug it off as an early access growing pain given how experimental the whole concept already is.

Whether a session of The Choicer Voicer lands depends almost entirely on whether your group is willing to build a voice pack before playing rather than waiting for the base install to hand you material. Get past that setup step, and the same judge panel that scored your terrible impression of a meme clip can just as easily judge a friend butchering their attempt at Victor from an entirely different game — that’s the whole point of a format built to be filled in by whoever’s holding the microphone.

Seraphinite AcceleratorOptimized by Seraphinite Accelerator
Turns on site high speed to be attractive for people and search engines.